Skip to content
Welcome
  • Welcome to NJ Vaccine Science
  • Recent Blog Post
  • About NJ Vaccine Science

NJ Vaccine Science

A site dedicated to making the case for vaccine exemptions using CDC statements, vaccine inserts, and peer reviewed science.

  • Vaccine Safety
    • Adverse Events After Vaccination – How Often They Occur
    • Adverse Effects of Vaccines Evidence and Causality – 2012 IOM Report
    • Immunity for Vaccine Manufactures & HHS Failure to Submit Safety Reports
    • Plotkin Deposition
    • WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit
    • ACIP Meeting for Hepislav-B
    • DTP: The Story of an Unsafe Vaccine
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • Hep B
    • Pertussis
    • Influenza
    • NJ Assembly Woman Vandervalk – Protecting an at-risk population
  • Herd Immunity
    • Problems with Herd Immunity: District 11 Stories
      • The Medically Complicated: Keanu
      • Vaccine Injury: Gio
      • The Medically Complicated: Michael
    • Measles & Herd Immunity
  • COVID
    • The Overwhelming Evidence for Keeping Schools Open
    • How to tell the magnitude of NJ’s second wave?
    • FLU SHOT MANDATE: WILL IT HELP DURING COVID-19?
    • Alan Dershowitz and Paul Offit Advocate for Vaccine Choice
    • CDC, Oxford, Stanford Agree, COVID-19 IFR is under 0.3%

Measles & Herd Immunity

Measles Death Rates:

  • Prior to the Measles vaccine in 1960, the death rate from Measles was 1 in 500,000; 2 in a million.  That means that 99.9998% of individuals living in a fully vaccine-free US population did not die from Measles even though it was estimated that 5 million people contracted Measles that year. CDC source “Vital Statistic and Rates in the US 1940 – 1960” pages 85 and 547 (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsrates1940_60.pdf )
  • In the years leading up to the vaccine introduction, 1959 to 1962, there were 400 death per year due to measles in the whole United States.
  • When the first ineffective and problematic measles vaccine was introduced in 1963 (with a second vaccine introduced in 1968), the rate of deaths attributed to measles had already declined by over 95%—between 1920 and 1962—and was continuing its downward trajectory. (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056803.htm)
  • According to the CDC from 1995 until 2009 the US never had MMR vaccine coverage rates higher than 92.5%.The CDC reports 16 death from Measles over that 15 year time period, with never more than 2 deaths per year in the entire US population. Our current vaccination rates of children for MMR in NJ are about 95%.  Forcing the 2% of NJ residents that take the Religious Exemption to vaccinate will have no discernible impact on NJ public health. (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/G/coverage.pdf) (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/E/reported-cases.pdf)

Herd Immunity

  • Herd Immunity is an epidemiologic construct, not an immunologic idea, first used by A. W. Hedrich in 1933, to describe the finding that a rather large number of susceptible children routinely escaped measles during any particular outbreak once a portion of the children had developed natural immunity (55%). https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-abstract/17/3/613/144482?redirectedFrom=fulltext
  • When immunity was higher than 55%, epidemics did not develop. This gave optimism to the US Public Health Service that herd immunity works at a threshold considerably less than 100%. As a result the “Public Health Report of 1967: Epidemiologic Basis for Eradication of Measles in 1967” predicted measles eradication by 1967. http://probeinternational.org/library/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/pubhealthreporig00027-0069.pdf
  • After herd immunity and subsequenct eradiation was not obtained via the measles vaccination program by 1978, the CDC set a goal to eliminate measles from the United States by 1982. This was primarily due to the understanding that herd immunity is much harder to obtain via vaccination as opposed to from natural immunity. Hence eradication efforts were abandon in the US. (https://www.cdc.gov/measles/about/history.html)
  • In the 1990’s measles was still not eradicated or eliminated. Poland and Jacobson, (1994) discussed the limitations of the 1-dose vaccines concluding, “The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons. Because of the failure rate of the vaccine and the unique transmissibility of the measles virus, the currently available measles vaccine, used in a single-dose strategy, is unlikely to completely eliminate measles. The long-term success of a two-dose strategy to eliminate measles remains to be determined.” (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8053748)
  • Measles was finally declared eliminated (absence of continuous disease transmission for greater than 12 months) from the US in 2000 although there were 86 confirmed cases that year. (https://www.cdc.gov/measles/about/history.html)
  • In 2012 Poland and Jacobson addressed the “Re-Emergence of Measles in Developed Countries” despite the implementation of the 2-dose vaccination. Key points from their study include (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905323/)
  • “Multiple studies demonstrate that 2–10% of those immunized with two doses of measles vaccine fail to develop protective antibody levels, and that immunity can wane over time and result in infection (so-called secondary vaccine failure) when the individual is exposed to measles.”
  • “For example, during the 1989–1991 U.S. measles outbreaks 20–40% of the individuals affected had been previously immunized with one to two doses of vaccine” and in the October 2011 outbreak in Canada, over 50% of the 98 individuals had received two doses of measles vaccine.”
  • “This leads to a paradoxical situation whereby measles in highly immunized societies occurs primarily among those previously immunized.”
  • “Our current tool for prevention has limitations that increasingly look to be significant enough that sustained elimination, much less eradication, are unlikely. Perhaps it is time to consider, in earnest, the development of the next generation of measles vaccines.”

Finally, it has been shown that during outbreaks some infected individuals developed measles as a result of vaccination. This infection is called a “vaccine reaction” but doctors can not differentiate between the “vaccine reaction” and a wild Measles infection without genetic testing. (https://jcm.asm.org/content/jcm/55/3/735.full.pdf)

Take Action:

1. Sign up for NJ Vaccine Science action alerts via email.

2. Stay Informed – check our our Blog and Advocacy Home page for action items, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

3. Call and Email your Senator and Assemblymembers – ask them to oppose bill S902/A969. Use this link to find your representatives’ phone number and send them a message.

4. Call and Email the Bill Sponsors: Senate President Sweeney: [email protected] / 856-251-9801; Assemblyman Conway  [email protected] / (856) 461-3997

If you live in Legislative District 11 sign our D11 Petition to protect NJ’s RE. 

Contact NJ Vaccine Science at:

[email protected]

Sign Up for Email Action Alerts

Email Address *

First Name *

Last Name *

* indicates required


Other Useful Websites:

Hope from Holly

Vaccine Papers

National Vaccine Information Center

Informed Consent Action Network

Vaccine Injury and Compensation Program

DISCLAIMER:

All information, data and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advise. The decision to vaccinate and how you implement that decision is yours and yours alone. You are encouraged to consult with your medical professional and legal adviser.

© 2025 NJ Vaccine Science

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Xblog Plus by wpthemespace.com